Totals from Washington County Clerk

2/16/2016

These are results reported by Washington County Clerk tonight at 8:52 pm

Next step is to wait for counting of any absentee ballots and board of canvas to confirm totals. That could be 2-3 days.

Justice of the Supreme Court
R. BRADLEY 12,062
J. Kloppenburg 3411
J. Donald 1361

County Supervisor District #22
R. Brandner 437
D. Meyers 234
D. Zoulek 234
D. Peterson 74
Write in 4

Rock Brandner still a steady 44.46%.

14 Comments

Stephanie

2/16/2016 07:09:29 pm

The people have made it clear what they want for the Village of Richfield.

Ben

2/17/2016 06:04:37 am

How many people advance from the primary to the general election in the County Board race?

Stephanie

2/17/2016 07:31:20 am

I thought it was one when I made the comment above, but apparently it is 2.This sucks that so many people are supporting someone who has a greedy agenda and is manipulative.

Doris

2/18/2016 05:01:11 pm

Agreed Stephanie. It's clear they really haven't gotten to know her. I personally have on an unrelated issue but it was very telling to me about her personal agenda. It's all about what she wants and she doesn't care how she gets it. Break the rules, change the rules, whatever works.

marie

2/17/2016 08:57:55 am

Thomas

2/18/2016 04:42:01 am

I have a question? On signs that are put on corners for any reason how large can they be. Sign by BMO Bank is it to big is there any reason for the sign Most signs in our area are smaller. How big is to big? Please let me know.

Doris

2/18/2016 08:20:42 pm

Agreed Thomas. My husband and I started laughing when we saw the one on Amy belle and willow creek on Saturday. It was huge. Disappeared on Monday so I think that was one that she didn't get permission to put up. I've never seen one that big with a picture; not even for a presidential election. Out of control in my opinion....but not surprising.

marie

2/18/2016 07:06:08 am

I cant see why anyone would want certain people to represent them at the county level, when this person is against the county for their enforcement of animals at large. Asking for a Jury trial???? really

Doris

2/18/2016 08:15:43 pm

Agreed Marie. I've been living the animal at large one for awhile. I shudder when I see "animal lover" on her website. I kept her dog safe at my house for 3 hours on a Sunday morning after he wandered in my yard for the umpteenth time. No tag so I didn't know who he belonged to. We could have let him go to get hit by a car or cause an accident. I deferred going to my moms house to take care of her (she's disabled) so I could watch her dog and get him home. We could have called the Sherriff and turned him in. After we finally saw her driving through our subdivision, we returned her dog to her only to be called names and swore at. No "thank you" from her. That's the kind of neighbor she is and a direct reflection of how she would treat people when in office.....probably would be even worse because she would have more power. That is not an animal lover in my book. I think I love her dog more than she does.

By the way, her dog did get turned in to the Sherriff recently by a neighbor. She had to prove he had a rabies shot before she got him back which makes me wonder if she even had a license for him. Then she had the nerve to get mad at that neighbor because they turned him in. Again, it's all about her. She doesn't want to take responsibility for anything. Ask anyone. I'm a patient person who tries to work things out with people. I have gotten along with all of the neighbors I've ever had my entire life except her. It's a "no go" with her. It's her way or no way.

Doris

2/23/2016 05:11:03 am

Hearing that there's comments being made about the responses here as "personal attacks". Sorry. Doesn't fit that category. That's just a response from someone who is defensive and not open to feedback. The things I stated are facts with supportive evidence. They are a direct reflection on how she treats other people which in my opinion are extremely important in an elected official. For me, her platform really doesn't matter. I first look at what kind of person a candidate is and unfortunately, I've gotten to see her in action on a personal level. She didn't care about me and the inconvenience she caused (or her dog for that matter) and that speaks volumes to me. Her inability to see that big picture makes me seriously question her ability to address other community issues. And finally, I'm a very busy person. But when it comes to who is going to make decisions about where I live, I couldn't think of a "better way to spend my time" than getting the truth out about this candidate.

marie

2/23/2016 07:51:27 am

AMEN Doris.
I don't even know you and I can understand your frustration with her.

marie

2/25/2016 07:41:08 am

The animal at large charges are going to a jury trial. Two trials and this person wants to be a county supervisor. What a waste of county $$$

Doris

2/26/2016 10:14:42 am

Wow. I didn't realize there were actual charges on the animal at large issue. I'm not surprised. She thought I was mean just giving her some constructive feedback. Good that someone took it to the next level as that's where it needed to go.

Patti

2/26/2016 01:24:14 pm

Very sad!! Taking my daughter to school this morning and almost hit a yellow lab right in front of her house. I believe that it was her dog. Had to stop and then the dog came at the car. I waited for it to move off the road before I continued.

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Totals from Washington County Clerk

Leave a Reply.

About

Archives

Categories